top of page
Section 29A(c) of the IBC and the Trouble with Subhkam: A Purposive Reading of Control
Subhkam should never have been transplanted: SAST and IBC pursue divergent objectives, the SAT order was non-precedential by direct Supreme Court fiat, and the positive-control reading under-includes the negative-control defaulter-promoters Parliament meant to capture.
Vedant Bharadwaj
Jul 96 min read
Reimagining the Contours of Judicial Interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
The author explains the decision in Arcelor Mittal and thereafter examines the impact that it has on emergency awards in India.
Varun Kasthuri
Jan 10, 20226 min read
bottom of page