As SEBI opens the gates of algorithmic trading to retail investors, this blog critically examines the circular.

The blog analyzes technical implications of GIFT City SPV framework, navigates some potential issues that may arise and proposes solutions.

The SAT ruling in Kunal Kashyap v. SEBI sets a concerning precedent.

The proposed amendment to Sections 72A and 72AA of ITA reflects government’s intent to curb tax avoidance through evergreening of losses.

The proposed amendments to insider trading regulations, although well-intentioned, raise significant concerns.

SEBI’s proposed expansion of ‘connected persons’ represents a pivotal shift in insider trading regulations.

The inclusion of blockchain into inheritance planning represents a paradigm shift with regards to an amalgamation of law and technology.

The homogenous regulatory approach taken by SEBI displays uniform attitude towards use of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

The author examines the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) (Third Amendment) Regulations 2024.

The author examines the ruling where the Supreme Court refused to condone the delay of the state party citing its callous attitude.

These amendments are a welcome step by the SEBI for catering to its huge investor base.

[ Himanshi is a student at Dharmashastra National Law University. ] The Committee on Digital Competition Law released the   draft Digital...

The question remains whether startups will adapt to this new regulatory environment.

The extension of Section 241 of Companies Act to LLPs represents a crucial step in addressing the current inadequacies in legal protection.

SEBI amendments are laudable but come with a drawback of over regulation and disturbance of efficient markets.

There is lack of clarity on data transfer that comes with proposed draft rules and it requires thorough consultation before implementation.

The author discusses the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 and analyses its impact on the banking operations in the country.

The article delves into a critical analysis of Section 447 of the Companies Act 2013, highlighting its shortcomings.

This piece highlights the departure from settled concept of promoter that has characterized the previous proceedings initiated by SEBI.

The article examines the potential of conduct remedies in addressing Google’s antitrust concerns.

The article urges a larger bench of the Supreme Court to address the conflation of venue and seat in arbitration clauses.

The author opposes the SEBI order as it reflects SEBI’s regulatory overreach.

The amendment bill is a noteworthy step toward institutionalizing emergency arbitration in India.

SEBI has disallowed any form of equity crowdfunding. Given the evolving market landscape, this regulatory approach must be revisited.