The real question is not whether homebuyers belong within the IBC. It is why insolvency law has become the institution through which failures of real estate regulation are increasingly corrected, and how long a regulator can keep failing before the statute quietly covering for it is mistaken for the solution.

The Supreme Court should have remanded the matter of revitalisation of the award back to the Madras High Court.

The March 2026 Amendments can be best understood as a refinement of lock-in regulations rather than a reform of pledge law.

When the Supreme Court settles the matter, it will have to choose between a better commercial incentive versus a fair federal principle.

The IBBI has, in the deferred commencement window, a rare opportunity to get this right before a single CIIRP is filed.

The nil valuation of contingent claims under the IBC is operationally convenient, judicially endorsed, and now sits atop a firm statutory footing after the 2026 Amendment, but it remains unjustified in its current form.

Real systemic growth occurs when fairness is not compromised to achieve commercial speed.

PPIRP’s record of sixteen admissions in four years is not a marketing problem, and the 2026 Act’s improvements do not resolve it.

The reference in Surana presents an opportunity for the Supreme Court to reaffirm the underlying philosophy of personal insolvency law.

The Strait of Hormuz disruption raises a question that existing legal frameworks do not adequately answer: where performance is made unlawful by sanctions, can parties rely on force majeure clauses or the doctrine of frustration?

India’s CSR law leaves an entire dimension of corporate responsibility unaddressed. Responsibility laundering is a foreseeable product of a statute that regulates charity while ignoring conduct.

A credible securities regulatory regime derives its authority not from the severity of its penalties, but from their predictability, coherence, and constitutional legitimacy.

Transparency in international arbitration is important for maintaining the credibility of the process but it should not be treated as unlimited access to substantial terms.

The Supreme Court's judgment in Alpha Corp has been widely read as a homebuyer-protective ruling; that reading is accurate as far as it goes.

This piece argues that the EF regime in Indian merger control is invoked in the language of synergies and scale, but never subjected to a structured evidentiary threshold.

As the Gujarat HC correctly holds, Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act 2017 is not constitutionally infirm.

The decision in Ujaas Energy highlights the inherent tension between finality and fairness in the IBC framework.

The consent portability problem and the successor liability lacuna are not just peripheral inconsistencies; instead, they constitute structural gaps that must be corrected.

SIF was introduced for investors who needed more flexibility than the retail MF without the institutional minimum of PMS. But the regulation has several structural problems.

This blog examines whether a prospectus forward-looking statement regime can act as a corrective framework to India’s information asymmetry problem.

The effectiveness of CIIRP post-Amendment will ultimately depend upon preventing disruptive pre-insolvency enforcement that frustrates restructuring efforts.

Until the three-judge bench rules, the operative position is Surana’s bifurcation, reached by a route the statute does not actually require.

Though the framework in the foreseeable future is not a replacement of institutions such as SIAC and LCIA, it is a bid to put India as a suitable arbitration avenue down the line.

Gameskraft does not raise the question of whether clarificatory amendments are constitutionally permissible. They are, and this article does not argue otherwise. The issue is the absence of any rigorous gatekeeping before the label is applied.