This piece argues that labelling alone cannot solve the deepfake problem, because synthetic content can be stripped of its provenance well before it reaches the public that needs protecting.

The Bill modernises the form of bankers’ books. Its certification architecture must also be modernised without diluting the evidentiary discipline that gives these records their legal weight.

This piece argues that the DPDPA’s post-mortem framework, when measured against Puttaswamy’s dignity based privacy foundation, is structurally inadequate.

This post argues that PROGA classified the game but not the money held through it. By deleting draft Rule 24, the Rules left users with a restitutionary right but no clear means of receiving payment.

Until Parliament and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India catch up, TSP resolutions, as well as those of other natural resources, will sit in the gap that the Supreme Court has just defined.

ANI v. OpenAI therefore represents more than another copyright dispute involving AI.

This article argues that insolvency law must respond to trademark title disputes through contractual structuring within the resolution plan.

This article argues that this shift towards offshore platforms, peer-to-peer, and decentralised exchanges has undermined CARF's implementation in India, limiting its capacity to generate meaningful tax transparency and reporting.

The JetAirways proceedings illustrated a legal vacuum which is yet to be addressed.

The piece considers the principal limitations of blocking-statutes and the underlying assumptions. By examining the anti-sanctions statute through the lens of force majeure, this article exposes its limitations. Finally, it considers the broader framework that may be required if a blocking-statute is to provide meaningful protection rather than symbolic resistance.

In this blog, the author investigates the sustainability of such automatic tariff revision mechanism, pointing legal and policy challenges it would face in materialising. Potential solution to the legal issues is discussed.

Read narrowly, AKG Construction rescued one contractor. Read for the principle it carries, it restates that the State may choose whom to contract with, but it may not pronounce an enterprise’s civil death without the discipline the Constitution exacts.

The real question is not whether homebuyers belong within the IBC. It is why insolvency law has become the institution through which failures of real estate regulation are increasingly corrected, and how long a regulator can keep failing before the statute quietly covering for it is mistaken for the solution.

When the Supreme Court settles the matter, it will have to choose between a better commercial incentive versus a fair federal principle.

The reference in Surana presents an opportunity for the Supreme Court to reaffirm the underlying philosophy of personal insolvency law.

The Strait of Hormuz disruption raises a question that existing legal frameworks do not adequately answer: where performance is made unlawful by sanctions, can parties rely on force majeure clauses or the doctrine of frustration?

The consent portability problem and the successor liability lacuna are not just peripheral inconsistencies; instead, they constitute structural gaps that must be corrected.

Until the three-judge bench rules, the operative position is Surana’s bifurcation, reached by a route the statute does not actually require.

Subscriptions are not forever and fiduciaries must rethink their subscriber agreements and offerings to keep up.

Creditors and practitioners should take heed - when in doubt, draft guarantees clearly. Otherwise, as the ruling reflects, informal promises of support will not give creditors the “financial debt” status that they may seek under the Code.

The continued exclusion of FOCCs, the rigid profitability and control thresholds, the ambiguity around “long-term strategic investment,” and the uncertainty surrounding InvIT structures and offshore exposure caps together narrow the practical scope of the reform.

There is a reasonable argument that India's courts have managed trade secret disputes adequately without a dedicated statute. However, "adequate" protection for well-resourced parties with carefully drafted NDAs is not the same as a reliable legal framework. MSMEs without the resources for patent registration, startups whose entire commercial value rests on a single process, and inventors without a contractual relationship with the party who misappropriates their idea are lef

The article is a critical analysis of how India’s 2026 IT Amendment Rules attempt to combat deepfakes by forcing platforms into automated censorship, inadvertently trading constitutionally protected content for regulatory speed.

Court did not adequately discuss the provisions of the IBC to determine whether the spectrum license can be considered an asset and can be treated under the IBC.