The NCLT’s decision reaffirms the principle that a clear distinction must be maintained between the provision of IBC and PMLA.

This blog analyses the merger process under the new rules while comparing it with the process under older regulations,

The tribunal’s stance to reject Philips’ application for capital reduction reflects a restrictive and flawed interpretation of the law.

The codification of the BJR would balance judicial interference with independence in corporate decision-making.

The authors conclude that the dictum is prone to irony and contradicts the objectives of the IBC.

MCA streamlines and simplifies the regulatory framework for transnational mergers.

NCLT must evolve to address the complexities of family-owned businesses, recognizing the impact of family dynamics on corporate governance.

Arbitration can be initiated while dealing with shareholder disputes if it is found that the origin of the dispute lies in the agreement.

It is important that the law laid down in the case of Hari Babu Thota be reviewed.

The recent Supreme Court judgment has brought forth a crucial clarification regarding the limitation for filing appeals under Section 61.

The exploration of CCDs in insolvency cases shows a complex scenario where debt and equity distinctions are blurred.

Hybrid securities, by virtue of having the best of both the worlds of debt and equity, are a highly desirable instrument.

The legal stance taken by NCLAT ensures that the remedy of compensation granted by RERA remains a robust and effective tool for homebuyers.

This article seeks to analyze the rationale and implications of the change to the aviation sector through the lens of the IBC.

A court of law that cannot ensure compliance to its orders is a mere courthouse of brick and mortar.

The prominence of cross border demergers should be acknowledged as a lucrative option of corporate restructuring.

Not only did the NCLT decision disallow the repossession of aircraft by the lessor, but it also projected India as a risky jurisdiction.

The recognition of consent terms under the IBC represents a significant development in the Indian insolvency regime.

The amendment is a welcome step in aligning private M&A with identical checks by the NCLT through schemes, thus protecting shareholders.

Authors analyse reasons for introduction of pre-packaged insolvency resolution process and highlight its potential challenges.

The author is of the view that a pre-insolvency restructuring process will arrest the flow of cases to the NCLT.

[Ananya Sharma and Zaara Zia are fourth-year students of Amity Law School, Noida.] The credit business of banks is on the rise, in...