This piece begins with an appraisal of the Supreme Court’s reasoning and then addresses the remaining concerns.

Author proposes an amendment to Section 34, expanding the court’s power and permitting modification of awards.

It remains to be seen whether the court will use its curative power to alter the arbitral award within its power to set it aside under S 34.

The use of a purely managerial doctrine, primarily developed for corporate governance and trade purposes, on arbitration is problematic.

[Yadu is a student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune.] Group insolvency is defined under Article 2(f) of the UNCITRAL Model Laws on...

Author deals with 2 problematic aspects and proposes amendments to public policy exception contained in draft cross border insolvency law.