The author aims to examine the implications of the lesser penalty regulations on India’s antitrust landscape.

A collaborative approach must be taken by the CCI and the Controller for SEP disputes involving anti-competitive behaviour.

Proving anti-competitive effects in innovation is a rather tricky affair since there exists no simple metric to assess damage.

This piece attempts to analyse the effects of CJEU’s judgement on the powers of Bunderskallmt.

The article analyzes the Microsoft-Activision deal from the perspective of new amendments to the Competition Act 2002.

It is evident that the current competition law does not lack provisions for tackling the unique challenges posed by digital markets.

The jurisprudence with regard to anti-competitive practices and IPR is still at a very nascent stage.

The current state of hybrid jurisdiction clauses in India remains uncertain due to conflicting rulings by the judiciary.

[Shivansh is a student at NALSAR University of Law.] A no-poach agreement is one wherein two or more employers enter into an accord to...

[Milind is a student at National Law University Delhi.] The Competition (Amendment) Bill 2020 (Bill) has received an approval from both...

It is crucial for CCI to play a proactive role when necessary rather than relying solely on other antitrust watchdogs to take action.

The Delhi HC, in the case of ICAI v. CCI, made an attempt to define the scope of jurisdiction of CCI analyzed further in the article.

This piece explores the growth of the gaming industry and argues for the need for active competition oversight in this market.

Per the author, CCI has passed the denial phase of the possibility of algorithmic collusion.

The author examines the settlement and commitment mechanism under the anti-trust regime.

India must have clarity in its information exchange jurisprudence in order to ensure robust enforcement against hub and spoke cartels.

Per the author, the proposed amendments to competition regime may have far-reaching implications for businesses operating in India.

The article aims to contribute to the existing discourse on adapting competition laws to the evolving digital landscape.

Per the author, the order of the CCI in the FHRAI case on the issue of misrepresentation sets a dangerous precedent.

Author emphasizes on the need to assess whether big data firms engage in exclusionary acts by essentializing the data.

The article discusses digital market regulation in India, highlighting the need for effective regulation to address various issues.

Author discusses the interplay of competition law and IPR and calls for a clear ruling to limit the scope of interference by High Courts.

This article examines the definition of 'turnover' as regards the imposition of penalties under Section 27(b) of the Competition Act.

The article discusses the anti-competitive conduct often demonstrated by SEP license holders.