By upholding appellants’ status as being part of a class of creditors, Supreme Court has managed to preserve the sanctity of 2018 amendment.

[Yadu is a student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune.] Group insolvency is defined under Article 2(f) of the UNCITRAL Model Laws on...

Hari Babu ruling gives scope for abuse of Section 29A by allowing backdoor entry of promoters.

Narrow interpretation of the definition of ‘public servant’ is concerning due to its potential implications.

There is need for balance to be struck between commercial wisdom and ensuring fair and equitable treatment of all stakeholders.

It is important that the law laid down in the case of Hari Babu Thota be reviewed.

The recent Supreme Court judgment has brought forth a crucial clarification regarding the limitation for filing appeals under Section 61.

The exploration of CCDs in insolvency cases shows a complex scenario where debt and equity distinctions are blurred.

The legal stance taken by NCLAT ensures that the remedy of compensation granted by RERA remains a robust and effective tool for homebuyers.

This article seeks to analyze the rationale and implications of the change to the aviation sector through the lens of the IBC.

This article presents flexible resolution approach as a way forward to curb the menace emanating from inclusion of going concern sale.

This article seeks to evaluate the role of the creditor-in-control model in achieving the objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

A court of law that cannot ensure compliance to its orders is a mere courthouse of brick and mortar.

Not only did the NCLT decision disallow the repossession of aircraft by the lessor, but it also projected India as a risky jurisdiction.

The article demonstrates that a foreign arbitral award can be enforced by a financial creditor in India under Section 7 of the IBC.

ARCs have the scope of not just reviving assets but also reviving businesses which would contribute towards a more permanent resolution.

The recognition of consent terms under the IBC represents a significant development in the Indian insolvency regime.

The author argues that the Raman Ispat judgment prudently captures the fallacy in the Rainbow Papers judgment.

Tribunals have denied computation of interest without an express agreement for the same. The authors have argued in favour of computation.

The main issue which revolves around the insolvency of GoFirst is the possession of aircraft.

There is need for a legislative amendment to bring in consistency in the treatment given to security holders under a resolution plan.

The author attempts to analyze the stage that the principle of commercial wisdom of the CoC holds under the Indian insolvency jurisprudence.

This article attempts to highlight the shortcomings of the court’s interpretation of the phrase ‘ordinary course of business’ in Anuj Jain.

Authors analyze the power of CoC to reconsider or review its approval in a case where the successful plan is pending the approval of AA.