Navigating symmetrical arbitration clauses can be challenging, but the judgement in Tarun Dhameja is a positive development.

To bolster the idea of reducing the intervention of courts in an arbitration proceeding, the principles of Scott v. Avery clause is one of the means.

This piece begins with an appraisal of the Supreme Court’s reasoning and then addresses the remaining concerns.

The amendment bill is a noteworthy step toward institutionalizing emergency arbitration in India.

There is need for further clarification on the assignability of arbitration agreements.

We are yet to see a case where an Indian court grants an anti-suit injunction in support of a foreign-seated arbitration.

The author analyzes the SC judgment in Rohan Builders.

Author proposes an amendment to Section 34, expanding the court’s power and permitting modification of awards.

The IIAC Regulations are surely a leap forward towards facilitating dispute resolution for MSMEs.

It remains to be seen whether the court will use its curative power to alter the arbitral award within its power to set it aside under S 34.

A recent judicial trend has considered financial soundness as an inconsequential element for disposing of Section 9(ii)(b) applications.

This article delves into the legal landscape on Section 9 applications and stamp duty requirements for arbitration agreements in India.

It is crucial to view pre-arbitral deposits as discretionary to ensure that each party has equal access to arbitration.

This article intends to analyze how the reasoning that the doctrine operates independent of corporate law is at best evasive.

[Harshal and Shaswat are students at Gujarat National Law University.] The recent judgement passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India...

Lombardi posed a situation that would have allowed the doctrine of unconscionability to be strengthened in contract and arbitration law.

By harmoniously constructing relevant legislations, a court under a Section 11 will not dwell on the stamping of an agreement.

The status of the 'group of companies' doctrine in Indian arbitral jurisprudence has been finally settled by the Supreme Court.

The Delhi High Court’s stance on third-party funding is a welcome decision in light of India’s pro-arbitration policy.

To improve the enforcement of arbitration awards, one step is to establish more benches for time-bound disposal of execution petitions.

SC has held that an agreement containing an arbitration clause is unenforceable in law if it is not stamped or is insufficiently stamped.

If an improper construction of Section 36 of Stamp Act is allowed, it would defeat the original purpose of safeguarding state revenue.

It may be prudent for the SC to issue clarifications with respect to the various matters in question which remain unanswered in NN Global.

The author analyses NN Global by comparing it to the pre-conditions of this judgment and its impact on the arbitration mechanism in India.