SEBI has disallowed any form of equity crowdfunding. Given the evolving market landscape, this regulatory approach must be revisited.

The tribunal’s stance to reject Philips’ application for capital reduction reflects a restrictive and flawed interpretation of the law.

The codification of the BJR would balance judicial interference with independence in corporate decision-making.

This post examines the requirement of being a ‘member’ to maintain oppression and mismanagement petitions.

The authors conclude that the dictum is prone to irony and contradicts the objectives of the IBC.

A stable and predictable regulatory framework for the exit rights of PE investors is crucial for fostering investor confidence.

MCA streamlines and simplifies the regulatory framework for transnational mergers.

This article explores the rise of SPACs, their potential advantages and challenges in the Indian context.

To realise the promise of independent directors, strict legislation, improved training and cultural shifts in boardroom dynamics are needed.

The SC ruling helps the purpose of transparency and accountability, but there is scope for improvement on the corporate political spending.

NCLT must evolve to address the complexities of family-owned businesses, recognizing the impact of family dynamics on corporate governance.

The ROC order has possible ramifications for multinational companies operating in India in terms of increased compliance.

Currently, SEBI is taking a cautious approach to crowdfunding, prioritizing investor safety.

SEBI’s 2019 framework on DVR shares clearly misses the point of these shares altogether.

The authors examine the Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions Rules) 2024.

The instant ruling clarifies the precedence of the company law regime over the Bombay Stamp Act.

Section 241 provides shareholders with a versatile set of tools to respond to different forms of corporate abuse.

In juxtaposition to the Indian corporate legislation, the CTA presents both parallels and deviations.

The current framework with respect to corporate donations needs to be reformed.

It is recommended that the government prohibits unlisted public companies from listing directly on foreign stock exchanges.

Absence of a judgment establishing presumption in favor of directors and adopting BJR may be attributed to limited cases against directors.

Free transferability of shares under Section 58 of the Companies Act 2013 is not absolute.

The recent Supreme Court judgment has brought forth a crucial clarification regarding the limitation for filing appeals under Section 61.

The author highlights the benefits of introducing a direct listing measure on foreign exchanges for Indian companies.