The article analyses the role of AI as a new frontier in the digital market space.

While the CCI maintains rigorous enforcement against gun-jumping violations, its approach in each case exhibits several variations.

A mere private settlement cannot deprive the CCI from investigating concerns raised regarding the market structure at large.

While Google might currently appear insulated from regulatory action, the landscape for big-tech companies could shift significantly.

Deterrence under the Act is what makes the leniency, commitment and settlement provisions attractive.

The incorporation of antitrust laws into sustainability presents a multidimensional challenge.

The decision in INSA v. ONGC, if not overturned, would become a significant setback for competition jurisprudence in India.

The issue of algorithmic collusion is a pressing concern supported by empirical evidence and a growing body of legal and economic analysis.

The author aims to examine the implications of the lesser penalty regulations on India’s antitrust landscape.

The article analyzes the Microsoft-Activision deal from the perspective of new amendments to the Competition Act 2002.

It is evident that the current competition law does not lack provisions for tackling the unique challenges posed by digital markets.

Not all acquisitions could be tagged as killer; neither do all pave way for a content exit opportunity for targets.

To prevent hostile takeovers, businesses must be open with all parties involved, including shareholders, customers, and workers,

The jurisprudence with regard to anti-competitive practices and IPR is still at a very nascent stage.

The current state of hybrid jurisdiction clauses in India remains uncertain due to conflicting rulings by the judiciary.

[Milind is a student at National Law University Delhi.] The Competition (Amendment) Bill 2020 (Bill) has received an approval from both...

It is crucial for CCI to play a proactive role when necessary rather than relying solely on other antitrust watchdogs to take action.

The Delhi HC, in the case of ICAI v. CCI, made an attempt to define the scope of jurisdiction of CCI analyzed further in the article.

This piece explores the growth of the gaming industry and argues for the need for active competition oversight in this market.

Per the author, CCI has passed the denial phase of the possibility of algorithmic collusion.

The author examines the settlement and commitment mechanism under the anti-trust regime.

India must have clarity in its information exchange jurisprudence in order to ensure robust enforcement against hub and spoke cartels.

Per the author, the proposed amendments to competition regime may have far-reaching implications for businesses operating in India.

Per the author, the order of the CCI in the FHRAI case on the issue of misrepresentation sets a dangerous precedent.