The doctrinal tension at the core is between IBC's asset maximization aim and DPDP Act's rights-oriented approach focused on user consent and purpose limitation. The lack of legislative clarity poses the threat of privacy invasions, regulatory breaches, and user trust loss.

IBC’s objectives of focusing on time-bound resolution and asset maximization must be reconciled with the DPDP Act’s mandate to respect informational self-determination.

The DPDP Act marks a significant milestone toward protecting individual privacy. Still, the current practice of behavioral profiling and cross-platform tracking by digital powerhouses uplifts some important questions on the DPDP Act’s compliance with free consent and purpose limitation.

MeitY’s CMS serves as an accelerator in India’s journey towards informed consent in clickwrap agreements. By introducing features like purpose-specific consent, user friendly interface,  consent artifacts, immutable audit trails, the CMS seeks to ensure that users are able to make the right choice while granting their consent to data processing.

The DPDP Act is not merely a regulatory hurdle but a catalyst for reimagining citizen-state trust in the digital age.

The DeepSeek PIL is emblematic of a pivotal moment in the ongoing evolution of technology law.

There is lack of clarity on data transfer that comes with proposed draft rules and it requires thorough consultation before implementation.

This piece attempts to analyse the effects of CJEU’s judgement on the powers of Bunderskallmt.

With upscaling of cryptocurrency, the thin line between respecting one's privacy and breaching it willingly or unwillingly will vanish.

The successful implementation of NFIR policy is fundamental since it has potential to improve India’s credit landscape.

The present article attempts to look at the regulatory framework for the financial sector in the upcoming data privacy regime.

Author analyses the provisions regarding cross-border transfer of data in the draft Digital Personal Data Protection Bill 2022.

The present status of uncertainty around regulation of AI and data protection in India calls for a revisit.

The author argues that when determining an appreciable adverse effect on competition, we must consider privacy-friendly substitutes.