The dynamism of digital ecosystems is transcending boundaries. To protect consumer  and third-party interests against a refusal to deal abuse, dual penalty system under the Indian antitrust regime exists. However, to safeguard the legitimate business interests of dominant entities, the author advocates for the incorporation of defenses based on principles of necessity and proportionality similar to the DMA.

The DPDP Act marks a significant milestone toward protecting individual privacy. Still, the current practice of behavioral profiling and cross-platform tracking by digital powerhouses uplifts some important questions on the DPDP Act’s compliance with free consent and purpose limitation.

The IBBI has realized the value of market-driven resolution which it has effectively pivoted towards. The timing of the notification of these amendments must also be appreciated. India is notoriously a slow insolvency jurisdiction, and such perceptions can seriously damage credit availability in markets.

The pre-pack insolvency framework was crafted with the best of intentions. It aimed to protect MSMEs from the procedural weight of CIRP while ensuring that their businesses could be salvaged quickly and quietly. But in practice, it remains a tool too complex, too exclusive, and too disconnected from how MSMEs actually function.

The broad legal reasoning adopted by the court may be invoked in future disputes, raising concerns regarding a roadmap for future regulation and taxation. Applying the aspect theory here may result in jurisdictional overreach and risk upsetting the delicate federal balance enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The significant influence of hedge fund activists in the M&A regime have significantly altered the corporate governance in India. While they provide mechanism for key deals to go through, they are also able to suppress minority voices in a company which can take the form of their parochial focus on short-term profit maximization.

Although India has a robust legal framework to penalize front-running, such incidents remain routine. This persistence stems not just from legislative shortfalls but also from technological, structural, and institutional enforcement deficits.

This article analyzes and determines whether the Indian legislation and the judiciary are prepared to address arbitral institutions and the challenges to their quasi-judicial or administrative decisions.

The intersection of corporate governance and AI-related intellectual property presents a complex yet evolving opportunity which demands adaptive governance frameworks.

The shift to an effects-based approach under Section 4, solidified by Schott Glass and Google 2023 & 2025, aligns India with the EU's standards, ensuring only actual conduct with proven or likely competitive harm is penalized.

Calderbank offers systematically align private incentives with public policy by encouraging speedy and economic disposal of disputes. Litigants and arbitration participants alike are well aware that a reasonable proposal once made, carries real weight: refuse it at your peril, and you may as well pay generously in costs, even if you “win” upon merits. 

While res judicata has been firmly applied to SEBI’s quasi-judicial functions, its administrative actions remain largely untouched by the principle.

The country’s policies for financial liberalization are not based entirely on ideology anymore; they depend on the situation and are carefully planned. How the RBI allows foreign banks to be involved evidences the growth and maturity of the financial system. It is putting in place a filter to invite foreign money if it follows the country’s financial rules, encourages more trust in national politics, and matches what the nation aims to achieve.

MeitY’s CMS serves as an accelerator in India’s journey towards informed consent in clickwrap agreements. By introducing features like purpose-specific consent, user friendly interface,  consent artifacts, immutable audit trails, the CMS seeks to ensure that users are able to make the right choice while granting their consent to data processing.

India’s unique structure makes both asset-wise bids and DIP financing hard to pull off. Courts and regulators have shown the law can support flexible sales and super-priority finance, but operationally, every step bumps into entrenched obstacles.

As foreign jurisdictions adopt flexible CI frameworks, India must also reform its approach to overcome its competitive disadvantage. Thus, timely corrections will be key to unlocking the full potential of the Indian CI ecosystem.

The fragmented jurisprudence following the Shriram case, where tribunals stepped in to harmonize overlapping statutes, underscores the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Given the legislative silence on cross-sector mergers and the potential risks identified by IRDAI, a forward-looking solution should be regulatory.

From a critical standpoint, Gayatri Balasamy is a double-edged development for arbitration law.

SEBI’s approval of the CIV scheme as a model for co-investing in AIFs is a significant step towards modernizing the private capital market of India and aligning it with global standards. Streamlining co-investment processes, it provides much-needed flexibility and enhances the ease of doing business.

As India is witnessing the rapid expansion of digital lending in its financial sector, it becomes increasingly important to redefine its regulatory framework accordingly. While the use of AI models and ML in credit risk assessment helps in improving the overall efficiency and scalability, the challenges like AI-bias, data protection, and lack of transparency call for prompt intervention. 

India is at a crossroads where other jurisdictions have moved rapidly to align competition law with sustainability commitments since 2023, India risks falling further behind by continuing the antithesis of sustainability and competition.

[ Apeksha is a student at National University of Study and Research in Law. ] The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016  ( IBC ) was...

The Draft Directions mark a welcome evolution from the prohibitive regime of 2023. By introducing proportionality, excluding hybrid instruments and exempts REs from compliance requirements where their exposure to an AIF scheme is limited to 5%, RBI has made significant attempt to balance systemic concerns with market growth.

This article critically analyzes the legal obligations of independent directors in India, compares them to the situation on ground, and investigates whether recent reforms have gone far enough in transforming these “toothless tigers” into actual guardians of the public interest and shareholders. The article also gives recommendations which, if incorporated, might help empower independent directors to effectively oversee corporations.