SEBI amendments are laudable but come with a drawback of over regulation and disturbance of efficient markets.

There is lack of clarity on data transfer that comes with proposed draft rules and it requires thorough consultation before implementation.

The author discusses the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 and analyses its impact on the banking operations in the country.

The article delves into a critical analysis of Section 447 of the Companies Act 2013, highlighting its shortcomings.

This piece highlights the departure from settled concept of promoter that has characterized the previous proceedings initiated by SEBI.

The article examines the potential of conduct remedies in addressing Google’s antitrust concerns.

The article urges a larger bench of the Supreme Court to address the conflation of venue and seat in arbitration clauses.

The author opposes the SEBI order as it reflects SEBI’s regulatory overreach.

The amendment bill is a noteworthy step toward institutionalizing emergency arbitration in India.

SEBI has disallowed any form of equity crowdfunding. Given the evolving market landscape, this regulatory approach must be revisited.

By holding companies liable for disclosure failure of holding entities, the WTM order undermines the principle of separate legal identity.

A mere private settlement cannot deprive the CCI from investigating concerns raised regarding the market structure at large.

There is need for further clarification on the assignability of arbitration agreements.

Authors discuss the validity of e-notarization in India, focusing on the current stance taken by courts.

The Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 is potentially a move towards modernizing India’s banking industry.

The tribunal’s stance to reject Philips’ application for capital reduction reflects a restrictive and flawed interpretation of the law.

With attractive tax exemptions on EVs, the government has made remarkable strides in promoting EVs.

The codification of the BJR would balance judicial interference with independence in corporate decision-making.

[ Hemendra is a student at Hidayatullah National Law University. ] Recently, an interim order  was issued by the Securities and Exchange...

From a policy standpoint, India should consider adopting guidelines or legislative frameworks addressing the enforceability of AJCs.

This post examines the requirement of being a ‘member’ to maintain oppression and mismanagement petitions.

RBI’s reclassification framework is a policy statement that India is evolving toward a more balanced approach to foreign investment.

The expansion of UPSI, without clearly outlining the exceptions and information outside the UPSI ambit, creates regulatory imbalance.

The commitment mechanism will also provide entities with the opportunity to avoid incurring heavy penalties.