The jurisprudence with regard to anti-competitive practices and IPR is still at a very nascent stage.

The current state of hybrid jurisdiction clauses in India remains uncertain due to conflicting rulings by the judiciary.

[Shivansh is a student at NALSAR University of Law.] A no-poach agreement is one wherein two or more employers enter into an accord to...

[Milind is a student at National Law University Delhi.] The Competition (Amendment) Bill 2020 (Bill) has received an approval from both...

It is crucial for CCI to play a proactive role when necessary rather than relying solely on other antitrust watchdogs to take action.

The Delhi HC, in the case of ICAI v. CCI, made an attempt to define the scope of jurisdiction of CCI analyzed further in the article.

This piece explores the growth of the gaming industry and argues for the need for active competition oversight in this market.

Per the author, CCI has passed the denial phase of the possibility of algorithmic collusion.

The author examines the settlement and commitment mechanism under the anti-trust regime.

India must have clarity in its information exchange jurisprudence in order to ensure robust enforcement against hub and spoke cartels.

The article aims to contribute to the existing discourse on adapting competition laws to the evolving digital landscape.

Author emphasizes on the need to assess whether big data firms engage in exclusionary acts by essentializing the data.

Author discusses the interplay of competition law and IPR and calls for a clear ruling to limit the scope of interference by High Courts.

This article examines the definition of 'turnover' as regards the imposition of penalties under Section 27(b) of the Competition Act.

The article discusses the anti-competitive conduct often demonstrated by SEP license holders.

Author argues that for improving India’s competition law regime as a whole, the DG’s office should be merged with the CCI.

This article delves into the antitrust concerns regarding ‘dark patterns’ from an Indian competition law standpoint.

The CCI order in BookMyShow would lead to better antitrust regulation, in an age where market participants rely increasingly on technology.

Authors state that collective dominance is unavoidable in an oligopoly and the same has been explained through application of game theory.

Author argues that competition regulators ought to adapt to the changes and evolve in the face of zero-price markets.

Authors argue that the CCI has adopted an incongruent approach to the factors used in delineating separate aftermarkets.

This article examines CCI's findings upon its market research on India's pharmaceutical industry.

The author argues that the current stance of the CCI tends to establish a wave of ambiguity in cartel leniency programs in the future.

The authors suggest that the right to repair is beginning to gain recognition as a right that warrants enforcement.