This article attempts to present a narrower interpretation of the Rainbow Papers judgment.

The author evaluates the judgment in Vidarbha Industries which reverses the position upheld in Innoventive and Bharath Hi-Tecch.

Author proposes a middle ground where promoters and directors are at least allowed to bring proposals under insolvency regime.

This article examines the Supreme Court’s judgement in Vidarbha and examines the dire consequences that it will have on IBC regime.

The author argues that a separate resolution regime for banks is something India desperately needs to properly tackle bank failures.

The article addresses issues relating to flexibility given to COC and resolution professionals in the name of commercial wisdom under IBC.

Authors analyse reasons for introduction of pre-packaged insolvency resolution process and highlight its potential challenges.

In this two-part blog, authors analyze and scrutinize some of the primary reasons for the delay in the insolvency process.

In this two-part blog, authors analyze and scrutinize some of the primary reasons for the delay in the insolvency process.

The article describes the legal regime governing securitization while understanding the implications of the recent reforms in the regime.

This article assesses the rights of secured creditors conditional to filing of security interests prior to, and after the 2016 amendment.

The author foresees several ramifications of the SC judgment in Ebix v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions.

The author is of the view that a pre-insolvency restructuring process will arrest the flow of cases to the NCLT.

The article examines the NCLAT ruling Technology Development Board v. Anil Goel.

The authors attempt to answer the fundamental questions around haircuts and examine if the same truly cater to the objective of IBC.

The authors examine the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in P Mohanraj v Shah Brothers Ispat Private Limited.

This piece aims to address the impact of Section 10A of the IBC on operational creditors in the context of Ramesh Kymal case.

While the article celebrates SC’s decision on balance sheet acknowledgment, it highlights its failure to examine Section 18 jurisprudence.

This article discusses the issue of application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act to applications under Section 7 of the IBC.

The author examines a recent Delhi HC ruling that attempts to recognize the gap in the law regarding avoidance applications post-resolution.

The authors examine how Ramesh Kymal v Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power aptly depicts Section 10A as being asymmetrical and inadvertent.

The article examines several considerations around the question of whether spectrum is capable of being subjected to proceedings under IBC.

The article discusses ipso facto clauses from the standpoint of insolvency and liquidation process.

[Sambhawi Sanghmitra is a student at Chanakya National Law University, Patna, and Vijay Rohan Krishna is a student at National University...